• Home
  • Blog
  • Lawyerpreneur Podcast
  • Contact
  • What I’m Doing Now
Jeremy W. RichterJeremy W. Richter
Jeremy W. RichterJeremy W. Richter
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Lawyerpreneur Podcast
  • Contact
  • What I’m Doing Now

Apparent Authority to Accept Notice of a Claim

Apparent Authority to Accept Notice of a Claim

February 22, 2016 Posted by Jeremy W. Richter Insurance Coverage

Southern Cleaning Service, Inc. v. Essex Insurance Company, et al.: Whether an entity has apparent authority to accept notice of an insured’s claim on behalf of companies is an issue of fact that precludes summary judgment.

In February 2016, the Supreme Court of Alabama decided the matter of Southern Cleaning Service, Inc. v. Essex Insurance Company, et al. [Ms. 1140870], — So.3d —, 2016 WL 687048 (Ala. 2016), holding that an issue of fact remained as to whether agency had apparent authority to accept notice of insured’s claims on behalf of companies.

 Southern Cleaning Service (“SCSI”) had a CGL policy with Essex Insurance Company that SCSI had purchased with an independent agent, Alabama Auto. Essex refused to provide defense and indemnity to SCSI, arising out of a personal injury claim related to work performed by Phase II, who had been subcontracted by SCSI. Essex’s grounds for refusing to provide coverage was that SCSI had failed to timely notify Essex of the claim, by failing to notify it until 15 months after the incident.

SCSI argues that it properly notified Essex via notification of the claims to Alabama Auto, who (according to SCSI) had apparent authority to accept notice for Essex. SCSI propounded the following evidence to support its claim: all communication from Essex was routed through Alabama Auto; the Essex policy identified Alabama Auto as “agent” and listed Alabama Auto’s address while providing no other contact information or directions regarding how to provide notice of a claim; and Essex accepted and responded to other notices of claims forwarded them by Alabama Auto.

In reviewing this evidence to determine whether summary judgment was properly entered for Essex and against SCSI, the Supreme Court of Alabama found that the above-identified does not conclusively establish that Alabama Auto had apparent authority to accept notice of claims on behalf of Essex, but there is substantial evidence indicating that a genuine issue of material fact exists on that point.

Do your best work. Be your best self.

Get the first three chapters of Level Up Your Law Practice so you can have a successful and sustainable law practice that meets your needs through self-assessment, having a vision for yourself and your practice, and client relationships that are built on trust.

Thank you for subscribing.
Something went wrong.

I will never give away, trade or sell your email address. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Related

You also might be interested in

Former Employer’s Refusal to Provide Retiree Health Benefits

Sep 19, 2016

John Boman v. City of Gadsden - An employee handbook can create a contract between employer and employee, but the contract does not extend to matters not addressed in the handbook.

What Is an MCS-90 Endorsement?

What Is an MCS-90 Endorsement?

Feb 6, 2017

Minimum Financial Responsibility Requirements The Motor Carrier Act of 1980[...]

A Jury Demand Must be Endorsed, but Not Signed

A Jury Demand Must be Endorsed, but Not Signed

Aug 18, 2016

In Alabama, a jury demand is required to be endorsed, but not signed.

Being a lawyer doesn’t mean doing business as usual.

Recent Posts

  • Inspiration Strikes at the Oddest Times
  • Quitting One Thing to Make Room for Another (Lawyerpreneur’s Finale)
  • From High-Rise Buildings to High-Stakes Thrillers with Bonnie Kistler
  • Mental Health among Lawyers with Suzan Hixon
  • Coaching Lawyers in Career Crisis with Annie Little

Search the Blog

Contact Me

Send me an email and I'll get back to you.

Send Message
Doing your best work. Be your best self. Let me help you get there with my new book "Level Up Your Law Practice"

© 2023 · Richter Holdings, LLC

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Lawyerpreneur Podcast
  • Contact
  • What I’m Doing Now
Prev Next