• Home
  • Blog
  • Lawyerpreneur Podcast
  • Contact
  • What I’m Doing Now
Jeremy W. RichterJeremy W. Richter
Jeremy W. RichterJeremy W. Richter
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Lawyerpreneur Podcast
  • Contact
  • What I’m Doing Now

Discoverability of Minor Child’s Psychiatric Records

Discoverability of Minor Child’s Psychiatric Records
Photo by Hartwig HKD. https://www.flickr.com/photos/h-k-d/5981532224/in/photolist-a7yV8W-7vHfY4-5LXQkJ-5WP78w-bkmoV4-bHXdEk-7fr4g3-6Patf3-crW6HW-6fJrBA-BP2aRo-6ASbkU-6MAkqr-5ZdJBy-nkRq21-roCJtM-5LDsTX-e6W8DF-6jVSTU-94usEc-qwL6e-63fNth-5JcMNz-C5JQGo-6yAm22-bZ8Mh-coqXfb-d99jHG-cLqABY-7eK1ZQ-d2YMoW-c3mgTA-9GMJHf-awYF2Q-72XD41-9EnyEN-agEJLt-7CavbS-5MkvKt-abHTDf-8azYqy-6eKMHg-6M7Mev-77aLEe-5XzuSu-bo8dvk-6iQazy-qXhBCm-5MW23a-7VHjr8

Discoverability of Minor Child’s Psychiatric Records

September 29, 2016 Posted by Jeremy W. Richter Discovery & Evidence

Ex parte Dr. Barbara Johnson – When a minor child is not a party to a custody dispute, his psychiatric records are privileged and not subject to an exception.

The Alabama Court of Civil Appeals has decided the matter of Ex parte Dr. Barbara Johnson [Ms. 2150835], — So.3d — (Ala.Civ.App. 2016), in which Dr. Barbara Johnson petitioned the appellate court for a writ of mandamus whereby Dr. Johnson sought to be precluded from producing psychotherapy treatment and evaluation records of a minor child. Ordinarily, appellate courts will not review discovery orders via mandamus petition, but the court applies an exception where privilege has been disregarded. See Ex parte T.O., 898 So.2d 706, 710 (Ala. 2004).

Alabama Code (1975) § 34-26-2

The underlying case is a custody matter, wherein one of the parents issued a subpoena to Dr. Johnson to produce the psychiatric records of the minor child. Dr. Johnson avers that the child is her patient and possesses the privilege, rather than either of the parents, and the child has not waived the privilege. Pursuant to Alabama Code (1975) § 34-26-2, “the confidential relations and communications between licensed psychologists, licensed psychiatrists, or licensed psychological technicians and their clients are placed upon the same basis as those provided by law between attorney and client, and nothing in this chapter shall be construed to require any such privileged communication to be disclosed.”

Alabama Rule of Evidence 503(d)

While Alabama Rule of Evidence 503(d) recognizes a privilege exception that allows psychiatry records to be produced in child-custody cases, that exception only applies when the mental status of a party is in question. There is no privilege under this rule for relevant communications offered in a child custody case in which the mental state of a party is clearly an issue and a proper resolution of the custody question requires disclosure.” Ala. R. Evid. 503(d). In the underlying case, the mental status of the minor child, who had been treated by Dr. Johnson, was in question, and the minor child was not a party to the case. Therefore, there was no exception to the privilege, and Dr. Johnson’s psychiatric records were not discoverable.

Do your best work. Be your best self.

Get the first three chapters of Level Up Your Law Practice so you can have a successful and sustainable law practice that meets your needs through self-assessment, having a vision for yourself and your practice, and client relationships that are built on trust.

Thank you for subscribing.
Something went wrong.

I will never give away, trade or sell your email address. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Related

You also might be interested in

What Duty Does a Store Owner Owe to a Minor Child Invitee?

What Duty Does a Store Owner Owe to a Minor Child Invitee?

Oct 31, 2016

A store owner owes the duty to a child to keep the premises in a reasonably safe condition, or warn of any defects or dangers. If a minor is injured on the premises through no fault of his own or his parent, both the parent and child may have actionable claims for damages.

Damages When a 3rd Party Purchases Medical Debt

Damages When a 3rd Party Purchases Medical Debt

Sep 8, 2016

Larry Magrinat v. Myra Maddox - When a third party purchases a debt owed to a medical provider, the proper measure of damages is the full amount owed by the plaintiff.

A Finding of Compensable Injury Is Inadequate without Determining Disability or Benefits

Aug 11, 2016

Ex parte Lowe's Home Centers, LLC - Under Alabama worker's compensation law, a court finding of a compensable injury without assigning disability or benefits is inadequate.

Being a lawyer doesn’t mean doing business as usual.

Recent Posts

  • Inspiration Strikes at the Oddest Times
  • Quitting One Thing to Make Room for Another (Lawyerpreneur’s Finale)
  • From High-Rise Buildings to High-Stakes Thrillers with Bonnie Kistler
  • Mental Health among Lawyers with Suzan Hixon
  • Coaching Lawyers in Career Crisis with Annie Little

Search the Blog

Contact Me

Send me an email and I'll get back to you.

Send Message
Doing your best work. Be your best self. Let me help you get there with my new book "Level Up Your Law Practice"

© 2023 · Richter Holdings, LLC

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Lawyerpreneur Podcast
  • Contact
  • What I’m Doing Now
Prev Next