• Home
  • Blog
  • Lawyerpreneur Podcast
  • Contact
  • What I’m Doing Now
Jeremy W. RichterJeremy W. Richter
Jeremy W. RichterJeremy W. Richter
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Lawyerpreneur Podcast
  • Contact
  • What I’m Doing Now

Are Medical Payments Made by an Insurance Company an Admission of Liability?

Are Medical Payments Made by an Insurance Company an Admission of Liability?

November 14, 2016 Posted by Jeremy W. Richter Discovery & Evidence, Transportation

As discussed in a prior post, in Alabama, medical payments (“med-pay”) coverage is often written into personal auto liability insurance policies. Once a med-pay claim is made by an insured, an insurer becomes obligated to make the medical payment when its insured can show he suffered a bodily injury, as defined in the medical payments provision of the auto policy, in an accident (regardless of fault) and thereafter incurred medical expenses in the treatment of that injury.

However, the act of an insurer making a medical payment, standing alone, is not an admission of liability in the context of the insured also making a claim for uninsured/underinsured (UM/UIM) motorist coverage benefits. An insured is entitled to recover UM/UIM, when he has made a showing that he is legally entitled to recover damages from the owner or operator of a vehicle that is either uninsured or in excess of the tortfeasor’s available liability policy coverage. The term “legally entitled to recover damages” means that the insured must be able to establish that the uninsured/underinsured motorist is at fault for the accident.[1] The burden is on the plaintiff to prove that the driver and/or operator of the other vehicle involved was uninsured or underinsured.

It is much easier for an insured to satisfy the burden requiring the insurer to make medical payments, than to establish liability for a UM/UIM claim. Therefore the fact of payment of med-pay benefits standing alone is insufficient to create a reasonable inference that the insurer was admitting liability and had made a determination internally that it was liable.[2] “The fact of payment of medical, repair, and similar expenses made in an attempt to compromise or settle a claim, whether before or after litigation is commenced, standing alone, is not sufficient to create a reasonable inference one way or the other as to a defendant’s assessment of its liability.”[3]

Where an insurer is unable to show that the insured, by making medical payments to the insured, was admitting liability and was not merely attempting to settle or compromise on the insured’s claim against it, the evidence of a made medical payment is not sufficient to establish liability and is inadmissible at trial. Relatedly, where there is no evidence from which a fact finder could reasonably infer that an insurer ever admitted liability for damage or injury sustained by the insured, evidence that a medical payment was made is likewise inadmissible.[4] Under these circumstances, a trial court commits reversible error “in allowing the plaintiff to introduce evidence of, and to comment on, the fact that” defendant had made medical payments to the plaintiff.[5]

[1] See State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Griffin, 286 So.2d 302 (Ala. 1973).

[2] Lowery v. Ward, 662 So. 2d 224, 228 (Ala. 1995).

[3] Ex parte Proactive Ins. Corp., 668 So.2d 512 (Ala. 1995).

[4] Lowery, 662 So.2d at 227-28; see cf., Norfolk Southern R.R. v. Thompson, 679 So.2d 689, 695 (Ala. 1996). The Supreme Court of Alabama held in Lowery v. Ward that documents related to the insurer’s partial payment for plaintiff’s damages were not admissible as evidence of admission of liability by the insurer. The Lowery Court extensively cited Universal Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Sherrill, in which evidence of med pay benefits were admitted as evidence to the jury; however, the Lowery Court distinguished its case from that of Sherrill where the evidence of med pay benefits was used in answering a question of coverage, not of liability. “The evidence of payment of the medical benefits in Sherrill was proper, because the payment could be taken as an admission of liability under the terms of the policy. In the present case, however, the plaintiffs failed to show that Alfa, by paying for the damage to the plaintiffs’ automobile, was admitting liability and was not merely attempting to settle or compromise the plaintiffs’ tort claim against its insureds.” Lowery, 662 So. 2d at 228-29.

[5] Ex parte Proactive Ins. Corp., 668 So.2d at 512.

Do your best work. Be your best self.

Get the first three chapters of Level Up Your Law Practice so you can have a successful and sustainable law practice that meets your needs through self-assessment, having a vision for yourself and your practice, and client relationships that are built on trust.

Thank you for subscribing.
Something went wrong.

I will never give away, trade or sell your email address. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Related

You also might be interested in

Applying Alabama’s Guest-Passenger Statute to ATVs
Photo by Matt Lehrer. https://www.flickr.com/photos/mattlehrer/831275637/in/photolist-6PAcnk-6PAcnr-6PAcnv-8rE4mS-5D2MDD-ixgyNN-8w36Fd-oh9B9u-7rgMsJ-7LQzNb-7LLCgx-7LQzUo-7LLCiK-2gsvhz-7Y7shZ-2gst2i-2gss32-2gwW8L-4xBfdB-am1QLM

Applying Alabama’s Guest-Passenger Statute to ATVs

Aug 3, 2016

Alabama's guest-passenger statute likely applies to passengers injured in four-wheeler or other ATV accidents.

Presumption of Revocation for a Lost Will

Jun 25, 2014

Where a will had been in the testator’s possession and[...]

The Admissibility of Ipse Dixit Testimony

Jul 1, 2015

Ipse Dixit testimony comprises a statement of fact by a proponent (i.e.,[...]

Being a lawyer doesn’t mean doing business as usual.

Recent Posts

  • Inspiration Strikes at the Oddest Times
  • Quitting One Thing to Make Room for Another (Lawyerpreneur’s Finale)
  • From High-Rise Buildings to High-Stakes Thrillers with Bonnie Kistler
  • Mental Health among Lawyers with Suzan Hixon
  • Coaching Lawyers in Career Crisis with Annie Little

Search the Blog

Contact Me

Send me an email and I'll get back to you.

Send Message
Doing your best work. Be your best self. Let me help you get there with my new book "Level Up Your Law Practice"

© 2023 · Richter Holdings, LLC

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Lawyerpreneur Podcast
  • Contact
  • What I’m Doing Now
Prev Next