• Home
  • Blog
  • Lawyerpreneur Podcast
  • Contact
  • What I’m Doing Now
Jeremy W. RichterJeremy W. Richter
Jeremy W. RichterJeremy W. Richter
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Lawyerpreneur Podcast
  • Contact
  • What I’m Doing Now

What Is an MCS-90 Endorsement?

What Is an MCS-90 Endorsement?

What Is an MCS-90 Endorsement?

February 6, 2017 Posted by Jeremy W. Richter Transportation

Minimum Financial Responsibility Requirements

The Motor Carrier Act of 1980 requires that a commercial motor vehicle “has in effect the minimum levels of minimum responsibility,” in the form of liability insurance which ranges from $750,000.00 to $5,000,000.00 per accident, depending on the type of commodity being transported. Proof of the required financial responsibility must be maintained at the motor carrier’s place of business. The MCS-90 endorsement is the required proof that the motor carrier is in compliance with the federal regulations. However, “the endorsement is not a warranty by the insurer that the limits shown meet federal minimums; it is the motor carrier’s obligation – not the obligation of the insurer – to determine its required limits of insurance.”[1]

Obligation of Insurer to Pay under MCS-90 Endorsement

Once an insurer issues an MCS-90 endorsement, the insurer becomes obligated to pay according to the terms of the endorsement for public liability that results from any negligent operation, maintenance, or use of any motor vehicle subject to the financial responsibility requirements of the Motor Carrier Act of 1980. The Act defines public liability as “liability for bodily injury, property damage, and environmental restoration.”[2]

The obligation of the insurer to pay is very broad and is not limited by any terms, conditions, or exclusions in the policy of insurance it issues to the motor carrier, to which the MCS-90 endorsement is attached. “For example, whether the motor vehicle is a ‘covered auto’ on the policy is of  no consequence – coverage applies to the insured listed on the MCS-90 for all motor vehicles subject to the [Motor Carrier Act of 1980].”[3]

MCS-90 Endorsement Is Not Insurance, but a Suretyship

At its essence, the MCS-90 endorsement is not insurance, but rather a suretyship that guarantees the public there will be some source of funds to pay for a claim that an insured is legally obligated to pay. The MCS-90 “covers all vehicles owned, operated, or maintained by the insured regardless of whether or not each motor vehicle is specifically described in the policy.”[4]

Insurer May be Entitled to Reimbursement from Insured

For the public at-large, the most important aspect of the MCS-90 endorsement is that if a claim would not have been covered under the policy, but for the MCS-90 endorsement provisions (i.e., the insured motor carrier’s vehicle involved in the collision isn’t listed on the insurance policy), the insurer must pay the claim. The insurance provider then has the right to seek reimbursement from the insured.


Need to fill some gaps in your knowledge of trucking regulations, common compliance problems, and post-accident evidence preservation? Buy my e-book A Trucking Litigation Primer on Amazon.


Footnotes

[1] Stanovich, Craig F., “5 Important Things You Should Know about the MCS-90,” AmWINS Group, Inc. (link).

[2] FMCSA, “Form MCS-90,” (link).

[3] Stanovich, Craig F., “5 Important Things You Should Know about the MCS-90,” AmWINS Group, Inc. (link).

[4] Forst, Carson, “What is the MCS-90 and What Role Does It Play in My Trucking Insurance?” Cottingham & Butler (link).


Photo by Nancy Gluck.

Do your best work. Be your best self.

Get the first three chapters of Level Up Your Law Practice so you can have a successful and sustainable law practice that meets your needs through self-assessment, having a vision for yourself and your practice, and client relationships that are built on trust.

I will never give away, trade or sell your email address. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Related

You also might be interested in

Abusing Discretion by Allowing Amended Pleadings

Jun 14, 2016

A trial court may abuse its discretion by allowing a plaintiff to amend his complaint in too-close proximity to trial.

Are Medical Payments Made by an Insurance Company an Admission of Liability?

Nov 14, 2016

Without more, a medical payment made by an insurance company is not an admission of liability and is inadmissible as evidence.

Insurance Coverage and Road Rage in Alabama

Jul 1, 2016

In Alabama, an insurer would not likely be liable to provide insurance coverage for its insured in instances of road rage or other criminal acts tangentially related to the use of a vehicle.

The podcast you didn’t know you needed

Recent Posts

  • The Year That Was and the Year That Is
  • Intellectual Property Issues for Entrepreneurs with Becki C. Lee
  • Setting Expectations and Delivering on Them with Patricia Baxter
  • Get Comfortable with Being Uncomfortable with Mark Bassingthwaighte
  • Appearance on Litera’s “Inside the Firm”

Search the Blog

Contact Me

Send me an email and I'll get back to you.

Send Message
Doing your best work. Be your best self. Let me help you get there with my new book "Level Up Your Law Practice"

© 2021 · Richter Holdings, LLC

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Lawyerpreneur Podcast
  • Contact
  • What I’m Doing Now
Prev Next